Linux Distros. What's the dif?
So many distros, so little time. How to find your perfect "mate".
In the book (torrented, of course), "The Command Line". It states that step one for any project is to determine the best OS. Windows is never it. No Linux Distros are best at everything. Most specialise. Some by tasks, others by some ideal.
In-club, I keep my fave, Archlinux, on 2 machines. It's best for my needs to to it's focus on cli as the main interface, minimalism as the best security feature and huge repo. I'm also just partial and familiar with the pacman ecosystem and tar files.
My example is all. There are distros for everybody. Mine is not a good choice for beginners and those moving from Windows.
Mint is well-liked by most beginners and fairly simple while having all the modern basics and very easily installed.
Ubuntu is similar and built to have absolutely everything that Windows has and more, which is nice for those needing the full Western ecosystem of Amazon, Facebook, Google, X, and every other Amerikan tech corporation's software pre-installed.
Choice hinges on:
Application. Fedora does servers nice.
Ideals. Politics, privacy, open-source, etc.. "Google-free" Android is 1 example of an ideals-based OS.
Prices and conditions. I never sign "terms & conditions" for anything on Linux, but should you need paid software from Redhat or somesuch, both prices and conditions may be required. If you must, be sure of the company with which you make the contract as this is a security issue.
Size. I imagine Windows as a huge camper compete with twin bowling alleys, olympic pool and grand ballrooms of Victorian porportions. Having every single convenience on earth, it can barely move. Ubuntu is similar. Perhaps only the one bowling alley. Mint is a fine little runner, like a common Toyota. It does the daily. Puppy is pocket-sized and homely like an old VW bug. Archlinux is like the kit car you build yourself. It can be the lightest and fastest without even a desktop if all you need is to run a server or similar. Size also touches on security which coming up. Less to protect is always good.
Repository. Super-important! Always check to see if the repo has your needs. If it does'nt, likely you need a different OS. Fedora has "clones". Other OSs that can do all the same stuff, like CentOS, seem quite good until you find out you have to "compile from source" everything you could have just installed in minutes on Fedora.
See, repos make installation easy. Without them, it is time consuming and not something beginners want to do. An OS, to be the best for your needs, MUST have your needs on the repo for easy installation.
So, make a list of ever application you will need and compare this to what the repo offers. Never skip this step.
The best OSs are built more than installed.